学佛网手机版
Scan the code to watch on your phone

Master Zhaohui: Thousands of mountains compete for beauty and thousands of valleys compete for secluded--the Bodhisattva's body skills in human Buddhism

More articles 2020-07-10

Respect, you must take responsibility for defense

Shi Zhaohui

Professor Lu Kaiwen responded to my work "The Direction of the Teachings of Buddha on Earth" (《The fourth edition of the 183rd issue of Fa Guang, hereinafter referred to as "Xiang Wen" )，It is an attitude of not being concerned about the situation and claiming that it was a masterpiece in the 181th issue ("Guanwen" for short )，Just a "Brief description and preliminary comment" of the book of Bhikkhu Guanjing (Abbreviated as "New Interpretation" )just a "book review".However, the "Guanwen" has at least 13,000 words. Not only does it not see a single "comment" of "new interpretation", but it is filled with a passionate tone, pushing the "new interpretation" to an extremely outrageous level;Even this article is "Sighted Text", which is still full of such language that exaggerates the weight of "new interpretation".Therefore, Professor Lu should stand firm, highly praise the statement of "new interpretation", take the responsibility for defending himself, and never retreat on the spot, and push the responsibility for defending him to the original author's reason.Otherwise, it will be an extremely irresponsible manifestation of your own remarks!

“To the text, argued that the author should use the procedures for personal investigation in the monastic community for academic comments, but the author has long strictly defined: "demonstration" is purely aimed at the "new interpretation" of "viewing the text". (Instead of the complete book of Monk Guanjing )，And there are six questions.Therefore, the requirement of "Xiangwen" to the author is to first admit that "Guanwen" has "expanded but improperly" distorted the original meaning of "new interpretation", which has led to the author being unable to follow the map and correctly understand the content of the works of Guanjing monk.

However, if we follow the whole article of "viewing the text", the spearhead of the "new interpretation" is not only aimed at the "tutor" and "traditional Chinese Buddhism", but also claims that it is enough to "deconstruct" the "stability" of Yin Gong's thoughts, and "Xiang Wen" points out more explicitly that it is to regard "Theravada Buddhism" as a "good comparison group".Just ask: Does Professor Lu even dare to claim that it is not called a "strong value judgment"?Even the Bodhisattva's Holy Territory must be based on the original sutras and laws (Not according to the meaning of Mahayana Dharma )If you come for an investigation, otherwise it will not be enough to "relieve in your thoughts" or "rest with peace of mind". Do you still dare to claim that it is not "the Mahayana is not the Buddha's teachings"?Why bother to evade the word game of "disguised neutrality"?

As for the three words "continue", "generalize with partiality" and "model transfer", "Environment" is even more unreasonable:

1. "Follow talk" has a novel Confucian allusion, and its comparison word is "follow talk".Professor Jiang Canteng is the first scholar to switch to this term in Buddhism;When he uses it, he can take into account the original meaning of the source seriously."Guanwen" obviously has no idea where it comes from, so Zhang Fei beat Yue Fei and "received" the secret.

“Although Xiang Wen reluctantly argued that "continuing talk" means "continuing the research topic" and "international academic integration", there are many people who "continuing the research topic" with the tutor of the Yin Gong. How can it be qualified to "continuing talk"?If this sentence can be understood, even Chen Shui-bian said "four nos and ones" can be said to be based on ***Why is it because of the "Jiang Eight Points" and "continue to talk about it"?The "unification and independence" topic is "consistent"!According to this logic, whoever the microphone is called "continue"!

As for the term "international academic integration", it is even more inflated.It seems that Yinshun Studies must rely on the "new interpretation" of Guanjing to "cross local dioceses and elevate from regionalization to globalization", but completely ignores the fact that Yinshun Studies has already had international scholars from China, Britain, the United States, Germany and Japan, and are conducting research on "crossing local dioceses and elevating from regionalization to globalization".Moreover, the author of the "New Interpretation" has never used international common language to write any papers that are internationally striking. Professor Lu is completely unable to respond to the part of his "New Interpretation" criticized by the author. He actually continued to touted the "New Interpretation" as a masterpiece of "new methods, new topics, new materials, new horizons", "new prospects" and even "integrate with international horizons". It is really ridiculous!

2. In terms of "generalization based on partiality" and "over-inference", Professor Lu said that the "new interpretation" is not "all negating" the thought of the Yin Gong, but just a "disassembly of stability", which is again a manipulating the word game.Question: I think I have "loosened and deconstructed" part of the Yin Gong thought (Although it's still self-inflation )，Then claiming that it has been a "model transfer". What is this method of praising "contemporary purity" and "printing"? It is not "negating all", "generating from partiality" and "over-inference"?

The value of the Bodhisattva Path has never been based on the saint teachings of liberation of Arhats or "Dharma-dwelling wisdom". "Sighting Wen" greatly exaggerates the importance of this issue, proving that he is really an amateur to the extreme of the Mahayana Dharma.The author wrote more than 10,000 words to answer this small topic. Lu had never read the content, but he actually claimed that it was "contemplation and hesitation" on the topic. This was simply too rich in imagination!If one or two scholars study the Yin Gong thoughts, because of insufficient academic ability, and "contemplation and hesitation" about this small topic, how can they "disassemble" the Yin Gong thoughts. (Dependence, emptiness, and middle way )The stability of the situation, and achieve the effect of "example transfer"?

3. In terms of "model transfer", the long and long explanations of "Xiangwen" are incompatible with the author's doubts.He argued that "the problem of model transfer has always existed." To be honest, "model transfer" certainly exists. The author has never said that it does not exist. Instead, it directly points to the Mahayana Buddhist movement, which is a kind of "model transfer."However, with a book called "Guanjing" and a few small topics, it is difficult to get stuck. This "new method" is not even enough to choose the different theory of the Śrāvakas or the different theory of the Southern Path, let alone face the Mahayana teachings!Lu Jing said it was a "turnaround" of the "model crisis", and even "guijing" helped guide ***The saying "peaceful approach to the world" in the cultural circle" refers to it as a "turnaround", which is inevitably gimmick!

“At the end of the article, the Buddha's teaching that "victory increases hatred and hatred, and the loser increases distress" was delivered, which is very good!Please remember this verse and do not start the battle lightly!Otherwise, "if you repair someone, you will always repair it." When you are repaired, you will only take out this battle-free card. I will no longer give it to you!

Published in the third edition of the 184th issue of "Fa Guang Magazine" in January 1994

2024-02-05 18:09
The theme of this website is mainly to promote Chinese Chinese culture. The content is for reference only. Learning and communication does not represent the concept of this website. If your rights are inadvertently infringed, please write to inform us. This website will be blocked immediately or modified or deleted as required. Contact the email address. amituofo7@vip.qq.com
Reward Like
world Buddhism Master Zhaohui Mage Buddha
Comment Q&A

微信分享

微信分享二维码

扫描二维码分享到微信或朋友圈

链接已复制